Consistency & Trade-offs
When the network splits, you choose what breaks. Know what you're choosing.
5 lessons · ~51 min · free
By the end you can
- State CAP precisely, including why partition tolerance isn't optional
- Tell strong from eventual consistency with concrete user-visible symptoms
- Reason about N/R/W quorums and what overlap buys you
- Fix read-your-writes problems with routing and session guarantees
- Choose consistency per feature, and defend the choice in an interview
Lessons
Start the course- The cable gets cut10 minTwo datacenters, one partition, and the forced choice CAP is actually about.
- Strong vs eventual, in symptoms11 minWhat each guarantee means for a user mid-click, and the cost of promising more.
- Agreeing without everyone11 minN, R, and W: why overlap gives you your write back, and the dials between fast and safe.
- At least see your own writes10 minRead-your-writes and monotonic reads: the small promises that fix the embarrassing bugs.
- Consistency is a per-feature choice9 minBalances strong, like-counts eventual: the decision framework and the interview vocabulary.
The account is free and so is every lesson. It unlocks the courses and saves your progress.
Design with it after
The design library has full system design prompts on a whiteboard canvas with AI feedback. Every one of them gives you a place to apply this.
Open the design library